It is helpful to look further into the international control of electromagnetic technology and mind control of victims, who are coming forward from the major countries of the world such as Japan, Germany the U.S., South America, England, Scotland, Australia, France, Taiwan, Bulgaria, Russia and more. What countries have this technology? International diplomatic overtures involving electromagnetic weapons include the 1977-1996 Russian proposals to ban "new weapons of mass destruction using new technologies. The public theatrics of the Moscow Embassy microwave bombardment from 1953 to at least 1988 and the public broadcast of the Russian woodpecker signal broadcast in the 1970s, ( see previous CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website articles) were diplomatic war games. The diplomatic protests (see Moscow Embassy section above) masked a bigger issue below the surface.It is clear that this is a diplomatic form of communication. It is not clear to the general public when viewed as separate incidents rather than a fifty year history. The USSR was most probably protesting U.S. mind control weapons. Both the US and Russia officially deny that they have these weapons. The fears about development of new weapons of mass destruction has already been reported by all of the recent Soviet leaders and yet this has been lost in the other major problems of the world. (see CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website, International article.) One example; 1986, Jan.27. Pravda Editorial on Gorbachev's Progamme of Nuclear Disarmament. BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. Part 1 The USSR; A.International Affairs;1. general and Western Affairs; SU/8167/A1/1. Lexis-Nexis.
".At this point it is appropriate to draw attention to the fact that the Sovietprogramme has been drawn up with due consideration for the fact that the currently prevailing balance of forces in the world is to be maintained at all states of its implementation, but at an ever lower level. No threat to anyone's security will be created at any moment of its implementation." .They include in particular beam, radio wave, and infrasonic and genetic weapons which, in terms of their destructive potential, could be no less dangerous than already existing weapons of mass destruction. .As for the USA, which is the primary addressee of the Soviet proposals, a statement by President R. Reagan described by the Western press as 'cautious and carefully considered' has been disseminated there. Unfortunately, there has been nothing more than that so far."
If Gorbachev is unable to generate a response from the world about electromagnetic weapons, it is hard to imagine who would. A war or international incident may expose this classified secret. The break up of the Soviet Union was a world-shaking event but only approximately twenty Russian newspaper articles reported Russian electromagnetic weapons articles. And only a few of those made it into U.S. mainstream press as allegations and unsubstantiated reports.
A 1993 Defense News article contained factual earth-shattering information and even this was not reported in U.S. newspapers. (Jan11-17, 1993 titled, "U.S. Explores Mind-Control Technology, U.S., Russia Hope to Safeguard Mind-Control Techniques" by Barbara Opall. Defense News is a major defense publication. See CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website for full article) At the least, the lack of reaction by the world, reveals the political nature of electromagnetic weapons. The lack of reaction indicates that mind control is tightly controlled with classified treaties and negotiations behind diplomatic doors.
Since the break up of the Soviet Union, there has been a few articles on mind control in U.S. publications. The FBI was interested in using mind control on David Koresh, (see previous CAHRA [now Mind Justice] article) The public hardly reacted to a short article on Koresh and the FBI in U.S. News and World Report, Newsweek and Time magazine.
In the early 1990s, the U.S. mainstream newspapers and journals reported on the Pentagon's 'new' electromagnetic nonlethal weapons program. The technology that has been classified for forty years was finally declassified (see U.S. News and World Report 7-7-97, above). The break up of the Soviet Union and lack of a fifty year enemy, created an opportunity for declassifying the least important electromagnetic technology.
The whole picture of a classified new weapon more powerful than the bomb has never been presented to the public in U.S. mainstream press. National security issues in mainstream publications are controlled by the CIA, (see Washington Post quote under National Security section above.) and the U.S. control of electromagnetic weapons will not reach the mainstream press. In addition, there will probably not be another significant event like the break up of the Soviet Union in the near future and the technology will likely continue to be developed out of the public eye.
In brief, Russia no doubt alerted the world in the above cited instances about electromagnetic weapons. Most governments in the world must know of this sophisticated technology, deny it officially and are working on obtaining it or have it. The world distribution of the atomic bomb can be used to make an educated guess as to what is happening under national security. Did Russia or the U.S. give this technology to their allies? There are many unanswered questions and much research that could be done. The public is in the dark and the use of the technology is most likely being controlled by global agreements and arms control detente'. Once this is public knowledge, change can take place. The technology can be used to save lives. Human rights abuses can stop. And the experience of the atomic bomb can be applied to electromagnetic weapon technologies.
Not one person, even the most powerful, can stop it
It is doubtful that one person such as Gorbachev or President Clinton could stop electromagnetic weapons programs. President Clinton or any president would arguably not have the clout to face the intelligence agencies or the Pentagon over such a deeply entrenched program involving careers and billions of dollars.
Missed opportunity for one world government
After fifty years, mind control technology is in the hands of many, mainly the intelligence agencies, the pentagon, defense corporations and scientific research centers. The 1993 Defense News article cited above stated,
"Known as acoustic psycho-correction, the capability to control minds and alter behavior of civilians and soldiers may soon be shared with U.S. military, medical and political officials, according to U.S. and Russian sources. .Therefore, the Russian authors have proposed a bilateral Center for Psycho-technologies where U.S. and Russian authorities could monitor and restrict the emerging capabilities."The technology itself is so highly sophisticated that like the atomic bomb, only industrialized countries could produce it. Mind control is here to stay. It is only a matter of when it will be declassified and how? As Dr. Robert Becker, the two time Nobel prize nominee said, it may be too late to stop it.
Classified electromagnetic arms race is over: U.S. won
There are no major enemies of the United States. It is doubtful that the many countries of the world could agree and coordinate efforts against the United States. It would seem that the United States does and will have world control. This weapon would make it possible. There are surely third world countries who have had mind control technology tested and used on them. This is a great area of research for an investigative reporter. There is no public knowledge, except for claims by Saddam Hussein. of use of mind control weapons to cause a heart attack and more. (See CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website, human rights article). The CIA's history confirms the U.S. policy of 'policing the world'.
It is safe to predict that the next world war will be bloodless and silent. There may be no battles. The silent third world war will be over without a single bullet being fired.
Other countries would be less likely to cross the United States since the weapon is silent, unprovable and more powerful than the bomb. And if other countries tried to talk about U.S. mind control weapons, no doubt the U.S. could silence them, as a warning to others in the know. Nobody will talk about it because everyone has something to lose. Any victim will tell you, that they would not wish this weapon upon anyone. So everyone keeps silent. Only the USSR publicly protested with electromagnetic weapons against the United States, since the 1950s up to the 1990s.
The 'bomb' or electromagnetic weapon has never been dropped publicly like the atomic bomb at Hiroshima. Does China have mind control? They have electromagnetic weapons, (see nonlethal weapons article, CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website). Perhaps an incident with China may reveal this technology. Incidents, like the break up of the Soviet Union, even that, did not affect mind control international policy. It is unlikely that a future incident will reveal electromagnetic mind control weapons, based on the Russian diplomatic protests via the Moscow signal, etc.
No political hot potato: world opinion does not significantly influence U.S.
The U.S. is in an ideal position. The public does not know about the weapon. If it is used there is no proof tying it to the U.S. and everyone knows not to talk about it or they may be the next victim. One of the many rumors is that Naval Admiral Boorda, who committed suicide, tried to reveal this technology and became a victim. (see strategy section above).
The U.S. has nothing to lose, nothing to fear. There is everything to gain in keeping this technology classified. A large bureaucracy supports and perpetuates its growth. There are crimes to cover up. The weapons are powerful intelligence tools which maintain U.S. superiority. Victims can count on a continuing strong national security law in the United States.
Government documents describe control of space, rather than a defensive strategy, for example. See Covert Action Quarterly, Number 68, page 35. The nonconsensual experiment and intelligence programs would be likely to expand. The U.S. is maintaining and broadening its global position today.
The United State's position in the human rights community: a powerful force
In the World Court, one country can bring charges against another, but the US is the superpower in the international arena and no country wants the wrath of the US against them. In the UN, the US is the superpower with the most clout, although this complicated relationship needs further investigation. The US has the most relative wealth and power in the world and countries are reluctant to speak out or criticize them in a meaningful or serious way. The proposed International Criminal Court of Justice is opposed by the United States and supported by most other countries. It may be an avenue for international justice in the future.
Comparisons to the atomic bomb and biological weapons: a probable pattern of development and use
It requires a large bureaucracy to run programs involving thousands of victims, all over the United States and the world. Because many people are involved, it will be less important to the US government to keep this classified during the next 50 years. Russia and the US have this technology, it can be safely assumed, see previous CAHRA [now Mind Justice] articles. And the US is no doubt trying to control Russia's use of the technology. There would also be classified treaties to control its use. By looking at chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, similarities can be drawn. Sacramento Bee 10-2-99 p. A28 stated that the Pentagon created an agency to counter the growing threat of doomsday chemical, biological and nuclear weapons with a budget of $ 1.9 billion for 1999. At least 25 countries have, or are in the process of developing these weapons, according to Defense Secretary William Cohen. The classified electromagnetic weapons would most probably develop in a similar way.
Controlling the brain for military purposes is a physics problem and eventually other countries have or will figure out how to develop it. Like the atomic bomb, electromagnetic weapons will probably be declassified and used for beneficial purposes as well as for military use. Nuclear power and radioactive treatments for cancer have been some of the side benefits of the development of the atomic bomb It is a comforting fact that the atomic bomb has been used in war only once. The technology to read people's thoughts, like the technology to make an atomic bomb will probably not be available to the general public. It seems likely that mind control electromagnetic technology will be used for military purposes and for applications to space and/or cyborg or robotics type research such as visual systems, motor functions and the development of classified devices.
An article in the New Yorker, by Richard Preston entitled "The Bioweaponeers" 3-9-98 has many parallels to the mind control and electromagnetic weapon technologies. The article describes how the second man in control of biological weapons in Russia in charge of 2,000 scientists and staff, Ken Alibek. With the breakup of the Soviet Union he was part of a Diaspora of biologists to leave Russia because they had lost their jobs. He stated that no one knows where they went, Libya? China? Israel? He works with the CIA and his information is classified. But it has been reported that the information is shocking. Again, with mind control technology, there may be parallels worth examining.
Bill Patrick is one of only two or three scientists still alive and active in the US with a technical understanding of bioweapons. He was a UN weapon inspector in Iraq and the Iraqi intelligence people harassed him for his work. He went to a Pentagon meeting on anthrax on the eve of the Gulf War and concluding that "these people didn't know what the hell they were talking about." Again, the parallel to mind control is that the technology use is being controlled by people with military interests and little practical experience. Patrick and Alibek have consulted and are friends. The article also mentions that President George Bush and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher were briefed on Passechnik's revelations,( the first biowarfare defector in 1989) and they put direct personal pressure on Mikhail Gorbachev to open up the biowarfare facilities to a team of inspectors. Similarly, top officials would know about mind control and electromagnetic technologies and are controlling its use. Governments are not motivated to reveal this information and until they are caught, victims must continue to build their case and inform the public of the horrific nonconsensual experimentation going on today. It would be helpful if victims can find the top scientists in mind control technology.
Electromagnetic technology, like the atomic bomb, is controlled by the government but has close ties with corporations and private enterprise
The top scientists and their affiliations illustrate the government corporation connections. Jeffrey T. Richelson's article "The Wizards of Langley: The CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology, 1986, Intelligence and National Security stated the following:
Even an 800-page history of the CIA, published in 1986, included only a few references to the Directorate of Science and Technology. Yet the history of the directorate is a key element in the history of both the CIA and the entire intelligence community. .It has designed and operated key intelligence satellite systems. It is also responsible for a number of scientific advances which have been made available for medical and other purposes. .The earliest suggestion that the CIA needed to make a concerted effort to harness science and technology for intelligence purposes came from the Technological Capabilities Panel (TCP), which had been established in July 1954 by President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in response to concerns about US vulnerability to surprise attack. Key members of the TCP were James R. Killian Jr. President of MIT and Edwin H. Land, President of the Polaroid Corporation. Killian chaired the TCP., while Land headed its Project Three, charged with examining ways of enhancing the nation's intelligence capabilities through technology. . The winner of the CIA's 1996 award for the agency's top scientist, John Craven, received the award for his work on three projects,.microwave technology [for computers]. A second involved .using laser beams for communication. The work presently done by ORS falls in three main areas. The remaining research generally has a dual-use potential, and is now frequently provided to other elements of the government or the medical and scientific communities. . The Directorate of Science and Technology was established because key presidential advisors felt it was imperative that the CIA properly harness the powers of science and technology for the acquisition of intelligence.The 1978 book National Academy of Sciences The First Hundred Years 1863-1963 by Rexmond C. Cochrane lists the seventeen PSAC (President's Science Advisory Committee members under Killian. They were top scientists of that time and it would be highly likely that the classified electromagnetic technology would be developed under PSAC policy. Here are some of the seventeen scientists and their affiliations. They may be important to this issue, Lloyd V. Berkner, President Associated Universities, Inc.; Detlev W. Bronk, President Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, James H. Doolittle, VP Shell Oil Co.; James B. Fisk, Executive VP Bell Telephone Laboratories; Caryl P. Haskins, President Carnegie Institution of Washington; Edward M. Purcell, Professor of Physics, Harvard; I.I. Rabi, Paul A. Weiss, head of developmental biology, Rockefeller Institute; Jerome B. Wiesner, Director, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT Herbert York, Chief Scientist, Advanced Research Projects Agency, DOD Herbert Scoville, Jr., Assistant Director CIA.
The 1978 book Presidential Politics and Science Policy, by James E. Katz, page 57 stated "Killian advised the Central Intelligence Agency and represented Massachusetts Institute of Technology." Page 149? stated " PSAC was given a broad mandate to evaluate and produce recommendations on weapons, strategy, and space questions by the White House. Eisenhower charged PSAC and especially Killian with identification and organization of the goals of the space program." Science and government were interconnected from the 1950s on and may explain the alleged space research experiments, the overlap of radiation and electromagnetic experiments, and the alleged government-defense corp. connection to many of the victims.
Research was influenced by political connections. Here is one example, page 161 stated " During his [President Johnson] administration, programs on heart ailments and strokes were accelerated because it was known that Johnson had suffered related maladies.
Page 187 stated, " Both the use of research programs and scientific advice had been used by previous presidents, yet this at least partially reflects the White house attitude toward the utility of research: the political payoff is more important than the actual substance of research." The NIH, (National Institute of Health) has been involved in illegal LSD and Tuskegee experiments and could have easily been involved with electromagnetic experiments. the book continued, "The combination of personality factors which had encouraged the rise of lavish NIH funding began disintegrating with the death of Fogarty and .[President] Johnson was able to take advantage .to reduce the lobby's monolithic impact." Political power exerts pressure on science advisory committee work and decisions.
International science: the same national government and corporation scientists make international policy
William T. Golden designed the first Presidential Science Advisory organization for President Truman in 1950. Golden wrote the 1993 book, "Science Advice to the President" and stated on page 2, "The American conception of a science and technology advisory organization to the highest level of government has radiated to more than 50 countries, including all the major countries. The establishment of the Carnegie Group of science and technology advisers and ministers to the heads of governments of the G-7 countries (United States of America, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan), Russia, and the European Community, responsive to a proposal in Worldwide Science and Technology Advice to the Highest Levels of Governments, has been a major coordinating event.
The Carnegie Group, sponsored by the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government, first came together in February 1991, with D. Allan Bromley (Science Adviser to President Bush) and Juriy Ossipyan (Science Adviser to President Gorbachev) jointly chairing the initial meeting. .It has now held five meetings semi-annually in different host countries,." Sheila E. Widnal is on the commission and is Secretary of USAF and affiliated with MIT while Walter A. Rosenblith, MIT, is a senior consultant. (mentioned in section below).
This is an example of the network of scientists who work on defense issues with the government, which has ties to the international level as seen above. Golden listed the President's Science Advisory Committee members and their affiliations, which are representative of corporations, universities and industry across the country. John M. Deutch, ex-CIA director was a member in 1985-89 and is affiliated with MIT; Simon Ramo, co-founder of TRW, Inc., one of the world's largest technological corporations; Gordon J.F. MacDonald, is Vice President and Chief Scientist of The MITRE Corp. Golden is also author of the book "Worldwide Science and Technology, Advice to the Highest Levels of Governments", 1991.
A case study: The Moscow Signal, microwave zapping of the U.S. Embassy
The following are excerpts from news accounts by Barton Reppert Associated Press Writer, Washington AP, entitled "Looking at the Moscow Signal, the Zapping of an Embassy 35 years later, The Mystery Lingers". This is an excellent example of how the government handles national security and electromagnetic weapons.
May 21, 1988. Thirty-five years after security officers first noticed that the Soviets were bombarding the U.S. Embassy in Moscow with microwave radiation, the U.S. government still has not determined conclusively -or is unwilling to reveal-the purpose behind the beams. Among the possible reasons put forward by experts: attempts by the Soviets to trigger eavesdropping devices, to interfere with U.S. intelligence-gathering operations or to affect the health, minds or behavior of Americans working in the embassy. Low-power microwave signals "continue to be detected" at the embassy, according to the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security.
.Over the years, several studies to investigate potential effects of the Moscow radiation led to controversial results. In some cases, the projects were terminated over the objections of researchers. The United States has made a series of diplomatic protests to the Kremlin over the microwave situation, beginning at least as early as the Glassboro summit in June 1967.
The Associated Press examined 5,000 pages of declassified documents from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Pentagon under the Freedom of Information Act and interviewed dozens of current and former U.S. officials, scientific researchers, medical specialists and attorneys.
.Nevertheless, these key facts emerge:
.The U.S. government apparently has succeeded in fighting back lawsuits and administrative claims totaling about $250 million brought by employees who were exposed to the Moscow radiation or their dependents.
-Some American scientists and medical specialists investigating the problem have been seriously concerned about a possible Soviet bloc lead in research on the use of radio-frequency and microwave radiation for "mind control" and other weapons applications.
-The declassified documents disclose that the bombardment of the Moscow embassy drew expressions of serious concern in the mid-1970s from two CIA directors-William E. Colby and George Bush.
May 22nd 1988
Health problems which have been reported among personnel working with electromagnetic pulse equipment include an unusually high incidence of brain tumors and liver diseases.
Donald A Myers, a CIA specialist on biological and health effects of non-ionizing radiation, prepared a memorandum which said, "Dr. Herbert Pollack, a State Department consulting physician, has found that several members of the embassy display symptoms that are non-specific but have been reported frequently in patients chronically exposed to non-ionizing radiation. Such symptoms include headaches, inability to concentrate and fatigue, as well as physiological effects including shifts in the ratios of various blood cells. "
Richard S. Cesaro, deputy director for advanced sensors at the Pentagon's Advanced Research Projects Agency, in an interview prior to his death two years ago, contended that " in our experiments we did some remarkable things. And there was no question in my mind that you can get into the brain with microwaves. .If you really make the breakthrough, you've got something better than any bomb ever built, because when you finally come down the line you're talking about controlling people's minds,"
Nicholas H. Steneck, a U of Michigan history professor and author of a book, "The Microwave Debate," said[the State Department's secret genetic testing program carried out from 1966 to 1969 under the cover name of the "Moscow Viral Study." ] the cytogenetic testing program "was set aside on the shoddiest and shakiest of grounds. .If nothing else, on the basis of that you do a follow-up study- you don't just crank it down."
Government officials .say one of the biggest lessons learned from the microwave problem was that it was a mistake to keep the radiation secret from most employees until February 1976. [There followed] .a series of administrative claims and lawsuits against the U.S. government by employees and dependents who alleged that they has suffered health injuries because of exposure to the Moscow beams. To help defend itself against such legal actions, the State Department in 1976-78 funded a $1 million epidemiological study of Moscow embassy personnel, carried out under contract by the Johns Hopkins U School of Hygiene and Public Health.
Dr. Pollack, the State Department medical consultant, said that ''' without that Hopkins study, State would be sitting in the soup, because there were about $250 million in tort actions on the books. And every one of those has been withdrawn without a penny being paid."
.The study released in Nov. 1978', concluded that "no convincing evidence was discovered that would directly implicate the exposure to microwave radiation by the employees at the Moscow embassy in the causation of any adverse health effects as of the time of this analysis."
[Several experts on non-ionizing radiation disagree such as ] Steneck, who cited a variety of studies that have been done over the past few years .finding significant effects at very low radiation power levels."
Public disclosure of the Moscow embassy problem in the mid-1970s spurred a substantial increase of interest among U.S. scientists in the controversial area of low-level microwave biological effects. "It had an enormous impact on the microwave research field," Said Steneck, who spent six years studying the field for his book.
For years, most American researchers had assumed that any significant biological effects were thermal-caused by heating of body tissues. This viewpoint is reflected in the safety limit of 5,000 microwatts per square centimeter set in the current U.S. voluntary guideline adopted by the American National Standards Institute.
The Soviet Union, however, has a much lower safety limit of only 10 microwatts, stemming from concern with subtle behavioral and physiological changes as well as subjective symptoms which Soviet researchers have reported with chronic exposure at low power levels.
Over the past decade more U.S. scientists have started paying serious attention to athermal effects, particularly effects on brain tissue of low-intensity microwaves modulated at extremely low frequencies. Since the early 1980s, however, federal government support for non-ionizing radiation bioeffects research has declined markedly. W. Ross Adey, a leading researcher based at the Veteran's Administration Medical Center in Loma Linda, Calif., told a House subcommittee last Oct. 6 that current levels of government funding -now about $7 million a year- are "disastrously low."
" There is reason to believe that this situation has arisen in part through a well-organized activity on the part of major corporate entities from the consumer and military electronic industries to discredit all research into athermal biological and biomedical effects," Adey said.
Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News, a newsletter covering the non-ionizing radiation research field, said that "what is clear is that Soviet researchers are extremely interested in the effects of this kind of radiation."
Feb. 12, 1976: Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger tells a news conference that " this issue is a matter of great delicacy which has many ramifications." He declines to go into detail.
Jan 4, 1977: A notice posted at the Moscow embassy discloses that about one-third of individuals tested have shown abnormally high white blood cell counts. It says the cause for this lymphocytosis condition is unknown.
The lessons from this article are clear. As discussed above and for in-depth reading, see April 1979 a Senate committee print, made at the request of Hon. Howard W. Cannon, Chairman Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. The title is "Microwave Irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, Review of its History and Studies to Determine Whether or not related Health Defects were experienced by Employees Assigned in the Period 1953-1977".