World-wide, victims describe the same set of symptoms:
say torture is hi-tech , worse than everVictims are coming forward from all over the world with stories of hi tech electromagnetic torture. There are reports of nonconsensual experimentation, counterintelligence programs, political repression and mass population behavior control. CAHRA [now Mind Justice] has networked with over 500 victims since it was formed by three victims in 1996. Russia has counterpart organizations of thousands of victims and since the break up of the Soviet Union, mainstream soviet press has published numerous articles. A 1998 TV program provides a good description of Russian experiments and it matches U.S. victim allegations Entitled "Secret Russia", the program is Geheimes Russland (TV-Tagestip, Der Dienstag im ZDF: 22-12.98-22.15), described the following, " Since the years of Soviet rule people have spoken furtively in Russia of secret research and experiments, which the Army and the KGB sponsor. "In the future are we going to be remote-controlled robots?"
Technology has advanced but human behavior has not kept pace
Briefly, electromagnetic technology works on the theory that the mind and body are an electromagnetically mediated biophysics system and the electromagnetic signals from outside sources can mimic the mind and body's electromagnetic signals and therefore a weapon can be developed based on these principles. Microwave hearing is reported by many victims and is an intelligence tool, according to the many government documents. There has been Soviet and American interest in this weapon as described in the following article. The Federal Times, Dec. 13, 1976 article entitled "Microwave Weapons Study by Soviets Cited." stated, "The Defense Intelligence Agency has released a report on heavy Communist research on microwaves, including their use as weapons. Microwaves are used in radar, television and microwave ovens. They can cause disorientation and possibly heart attacks in humans. Another biological effect with possible anti-personnel uses is "microwave hearing."
There are numerous examples of the correlation of government documents with victims allegations from the 1950s to the present. Just one is the following. FOIA CIA 1959 MKULTRA, Subproject 119, "To make a critical review of literature and scientific developments related to the recording, analysis and interpretation of bioelectric signals from the human organism and activation of human behavior by remote means." There is abundant evidence of victims claims but the political will to stop this abuse is not there, just as in the case of radiation experimentation.
The twentieth century has been called the bloodiest century in the history of man. (See CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website nonlethal weapons paper). Human experimentation reflects this trend. There are now excellent books documenting the international history of human experimentation. Examples of the rationalization of government scientists who conducted horrendous experiments has notably occurred in the United States, Germany and Japan. Victims have now compiled stronger information to document a convergence of the complaints and allegations by victims for over 50 years, to the history of UN disarmament documentation and the development of electromagnetic technology and neuroscience. Here is one of the best articles on a classified electromagnetic weapons arms race. The International Review of the Red Cross 279, Nov.1, 1990, " In spite of the rarity of publications on this subject, and the fact that it is usually stricly classified information, research undertaken in this field seems to have demonstrated that very small amounts of electromagnetic radiation could appreciably alter the functions of living cells. The article further stated, " Some research seem to have confirmed that low-level electromagnetic fields, modulated to be similar to normal brainwaves, could seriously affect brain function." The article continues, " Research work in this field has been carried out in almost all industrialized countries, and especially by the great powers, with a view to using these phenomena for anti-materiel or anti-personnel purposes."
It is highly probable that the discovery of the brain is used for military and intelligence purposes and space exploration by the U.S. military and other major superpowers.
Victims are organizing. Dr. Bertell and a medical doctor are conducting a study of claims by survivors. The World Organization Against Torture, with funding from the Ford Foundation and several human rights organizations has stated that this issue deserves an unbiased investigation. The European Union has passed a 1999 law on electromagnetic technology that would manipulate human beings. Not only the numerous uncounted survivors, but several independent professionals are putting their time and effort into this issue. Through facts, information and hard evidence, nonconsensual experimentation will eventually be exposed.
Human rights abuse in the United States: a fifty year cold war secret
The U.S. government does not want to admit that human rights abuse in the U.S. are as horrific as anywhere in the world. Political control and torture are now hi tech and computerized. Instead of developing medical cures, this classified scientific discovery of the electromagnetic system of the brain and nervous system has been weaponized just as the secrets of the atom and DNA have been used for the atomic bomb and germ warfare.
I have no hope that the U.S. government will own up to the ongoing classified cold war abuses until they are caught red handed. The history of secret government experimentation and survivor's lack of response from the government would support this conclusion. New York Times Magazine, 8-31-97, page 38 stated: "For decades, those who claimed to be victims of clandestine radiation experiments conducted by the United States Government were dismissed as paranoid."
Eventually, the U.S. government will be unable to contain this issue; this is the pattern in the past secret radiation experiments and the Moscow Embassy microwave bombardment. When radiation experiments were exposed in 1993, the government dodged the lawsuits and President Clinton gave a feeble public apology knowing that current secret experiments are continuing to this day. To appease the public, the government settled a few of victims claims. There was a Clinton executive order regulating classified government research and in this act the public was sold the hope that radiation type experiments would never happen again. The hope is false. Harlan Girard's legal complaint alleged that "government agencies are compelled by a March 1997 presidential directive to develop regulations preventing nonconsensual human testing. The government, in reply, holds that the executive order cited by the group does not have the force of law and, thus, does not confer a private right of action upon the plaintiffs."
In comparison to the murders committed, the ruined lives, the profits of billions of defense dollars, this is an insult to victims. The irradiation of Moscow Embassy employees as reported in the 1988 AP article above is similar. Dr. Pollack, the State Department medical consultant, said that '''without that Hopkins study, State would be sitting in the soup, because there were about $250 million in tort actions on the books. And every one of those has been withdrawn without a penny being paid." .The study released in Nov. 1978', concluded that "no convincing evidence was discovered that would directly implicate the exposure to microwave radiation by the employees at the Moscow embassy in the causation of any adverse health effects as of the time of this analysis." [Several experts on non-ionizing radiation disagree such as Steneck, who cited a variety of studies that have been done over the past few years .finding significant effects at very low radiation power levels."
My hope is that victims will learn from this reprehensible behavior by U.S. government, as seen in the Agent Orange, Vietnam vet case, radiation experimentation and the Moscow Embassy employees and the microwave bombardment. The U.S. government has a policy of unaccountability to others and a disregard for the future except to exploit the rest of the world for their gain. As history of experimentation has shown, the underdog may win small battles but not the war. Learning from history is better than to deny this cold reality. Victims should fight with every tool they can and use this knowledge to plan a winning strategy.
National security law: numerous professionals say it is used to hide crime, corruption and horrific human rights abuse
U.S. Representative Patricia Schroeder, Federation of Atomic Scientist Steven Aftergood, University of Vermont law professor Stephen Dycus and more criticize the antiquated and unconstitutional (according to legal scholars) national security law. Citizen's rights are abused and crimes are covered up by national security law. After fifty years, this 1947 law is a cold war relic that is in need of revision.
Victims cannot get the facts out to the public. The internet has helped slightly, to overcome this major stumbling block. The 4-27, 5-3-92, p. 34 Washington Post article by George Lardner, reported on a1992 CIA report on "Greater CIA Openness". Director Joseph DeTrani stated " PAO [CIA's Public Affairs Office]now has relationships with reporters from every major wire service, newspaper, news weekly and television network in the nation, " the report said. "This has helped us turn some 'intelligence failure' stories into 'intelligence success stories, and it has contributed to the accuracy of countless others. "In many instances," the report continued, "we have persuaded reporters to postpone, change, hold or even scrap stories that could have adversely affected national security interests or jeopardized sources and methods,"
This is one of the best articles for proving the existence of a highly classified electromagnetic weapons program. A 7-7-97 US News and World Report article on 'Wonder Weapons', stated: "And for a good 40 years the U.S. military has quietly been pursuing [nonlethal electromagnetic] weapons of this sort. Much of this work is still secret," Louis Slesin, a trade publisher for the electromagnetic industry further stated, "People [in the military] go silent on this issue more than any other issue. People just do not want to talk about this."
For fifty years, electromagnetic military research has been tightly controlled via the media, top scientists and government officials. Those who talk too much lose government funding and there are incidents and rumors of worse fates. For example, the unexplained deaths of 25 defense workers in England in the 1980s was described in the Tony Collins book, "Open Verdict". He wrote, "This wave of suspicious fatalities in the ultrasecret world of sophisticated weaponry has not gone unnoticed by the US government. Late last fall, the American embassy in London publicly requested a full investigation by the British Ministry of Defense. (MoD). .The Pentagon refuses comment on the deaths. But according to Reagan administration sources, "We cannot ignore it anymore."
U.S. government motive: a bloodless weapon better than the atomic bomb, experts warn
The connection between victims of nonconsensual experimentation and the US military philosophy is clear. The goal of avoiding politically unpopular deaths in future wars and confrontations is met by electromagnetic and neurological weapons which can psychologically control and break down the enemy without leaving a trace. U.S. military objectives for psychological warfare and weapons development match victim's allegations of experimentation and domestic counterintelligence programs. There are undoubtedly programs to develop electromagnetic and neurological technology to control brain function for counterintelligence purposes, in outer space conditions and on the battlefield.
This describes military goals in psychological warfare and matches the total devastation of victims lives by this technology. Defense News 9-14-20-98 p1, the subtitle is "Mobile Bedlam Brigades would sow broad chaos, confusion". It stated " Essentially, the concept's aim 'is to control the will and perception of adversaries, from privates to princelings, by applying a regime of shock and awe,' group member Harlan Ullman, said Sept 9. " It is about effecting behavior."
A story of oppression: exploiting victims and billions of dollars in profits
Experimentation on radiation victims was condoned at the highest levels of government and the same cold war mentality has condoned electromagnetic and mind control experimentation. There are billions of dollars and thousands of professionals working on this technology under the national security act. The bureaucracy that supports this technology is entrenched because of the long-term, classified cold war development of this weapons program. Further, because of the alleged abuses of the technology, the increasing arrogance of the military and a US foreign policy without arms control, an escalating hegemony is probable.
The top officials of many countries undoubtedly know about electromagnetic and mind control technology, it is only the public that is in the dark. Russia warned the world officially in 1979 UN disarmament documents. There was no major protest against weapons of mass destruction using electromagnetic radiation. Top officials of many countries would have to know about or develop electromagnetic and mind control technology.
Decoding the Brain: Top scientists tied to government and intelligence agencies worked on classified science
The evidence for the scientific basis of mind control technology, for the 'code of the brain' is supported by more examples such as described in the book, "Computational Bioelectromagnetics" by David Copson, 1982. I.I. Rabi Nobel prize winner, in New York Post, Dec 29th 1939 and his article entitled "We are all Radio Receivers." is similar to the discovery of the secrets of the atom by Einstein. Scientists discovered DNA, the code of life; the theory of matter and the atom. There are compelling reasons to believe that scientists have discovered the decoding of the brain and consciousness for military purposes.
An article by Allan A. Needell entitled " I.I. Rabi, Lloyd V. Berkner and the American Rehabilitation of European Science, 1945-1954"stated that " Following the war, Rabi, with J. Robert Oppenheimer, was among the most influential participants in the debate over the control of postwar American atomic energy policy." The article continues, "[Rabi was ] chairman of the "Scientific Adviser to the Policy Council" of the Pentagon's Joint Research and Development Board (JRDB). . Among its duties was to advise the service secretaries (after 1948 the secretary of defense) on issues of long-term planning as well as the implications of scientific and technological advances for military strategy.".The advisers assisted the founders of the Central Intelligence Group (forerunner of the CIA) in staffing a scientific intelligence branch."
The public can decide if the available evidence is proof of victims claims. Here is the 1988 AP wire story on the microwave bombardment of the U.S. Embassy from 1953 to the present time. "Richard S. Cesaro, deputy director for advanced sensors at the Pentagon's Advanced Research Projects Agency, in an interview prior to his death two years ago, contended that " in our experiments we did some remarkable things. And there was no question in my mind that you can get into the brain with microwaves. .If you really make the breakthrough, you've got something better than any bomb ever built, because when you finally come down the line you're talking about controlling people's minds,"
A 50 year clash: The self-serving U.S. position, no proven nonthermal electromagnetic health effects vs theRussian and East Block position, a scientifically accepted fact
The 'thermal effects' of electromagnetic radiation are known. Microwave ovens used to heat foods is an example. The 'non-thermal' effects of electromagnetic radiation are very small amount of radiation and its effect on the human body. Research on biological effects of electromagnetic radiation is not in agreement with the long-term US policy that there are no nontheraml electromagnetic radiation effects. There is a fifty year documentation of US government efforts to withhold funding of nonthermal EMR research and to discredit scientists working on this research. The 1979 Russian UN document discussed nonthermal effects of electromagnetic radiation and its potential use as a weapon. H.P. Schwan, A.S. Presman, Dr. Ross Adey, B. Blake Levitt, court cases and books on electromagnetic health effects; all discussed in detail the history of suppression of the nonthermal electromagnetic radiation effects.
Here are examples of how the U.S. government conducts controversial national security issues. The U.S. government handled the case of the Agent Orange and Vietnam veteran controversy by suppressing scientific studies. The irradiation of the Moscow Embassy and the resultant ill embassy employees were not compensated as a result of a tainted, government funded study. Radiation victims and Area 51 toxic court cases could not get the classified proof of their claim. The U.S. government is using similar, unjust and exploitative methods in the current case. The U.S. government controls most of the funding of electromagnetic research and suppresses scientific evidence for national security purposes. This is a major reason for the controversy today over health effects of electromagnetic exposure from power lines, cellular towers and cellular phones. The government has funded research in agreement with their military interests while the public is at risk.
Unclassified electromagnetic technology
There are examples of the intelligence and medical community's use of nonthermal electromagnetic radiation effects. This adds to the support for nonthermal effects of electromagnetic radiation on human beings. There are CIA documents, a NextMed2 Conference, an ElectroMed99 conference and an NIMH Neuroscience Research Report.
In addition, there are numerous examples of neurological research and the interest of intelligence agencies.
Just one example given in this book is the National Institute of Health receives requests from intelligence agencies for ways to incapacitate the central nervous system remotely, US News and World Report, 1997. There are several world class scientists who have made predictions and warnings of mind control technology over the last fifty years. One example of the interest in neuroscience; 25,000 brain scientists attend Los Angeles, California, 1998 conference on news ways to map the brain.
The next two articles are profound in their implications. This is what scientists are reporting, not victims. A second example, ABCNEWS.com World News Tonight with Peter Jennings March 19, 1998 A Closer Look, Magnetic Therapy for Depression. with Forrest Sawyer, John McKenzie An ABC News transcript described magnetic therapy for depression, " technology that can be used to manipulate people's thought processes, their mood, their memories and possibly even their will, if it is developed sufficiently."
As summarized in the NYTimes Magazine, Sept 29, 1996, on Magnetic therapy. "scientists realized the key was rapidly pulsing the current on and off. .Here's how it might work: A hand-held computer programs the pattern at which the fields will fluctuate. The impulses move through the temporal lobe and penetrate deep into the brain, where they interfere and interact with the complex electrical patterns of the subject's neural fields. .When Persinger focuses the solenoids on the right hemisphere. they sensea negative presence, an alien. If you interfere with the opiate pattern, people get very irritated,"
Key to consciousness: a military weapon
There is documented evidence that the US government has kept this secret for over 50 years and the US public cannot wait for the US government to tell them; it may be too late by then. The facts, the motive and the 50 years of technological development add up and it makes sense that the discovery of the secrets of matter by Albert Einstein and the DNA code by Dr. Francis Crick and others are public knowledge but the research on the secrets of the mind is a classified military secret. "We're All Radio Stations, .All Atoms, in Humans or in Steel, Found to Emit and Receive Long Waves" the 1939 New York Post stated. The nobel prize winner, I.I. Rabi proclaimed that "Every living thing on earth is a radio broadcasting and receiving set unconsciously sending out and receiving long-wave wireless messages." Rabi, along with Einstein was voted as one of the 'immortal' scientists of our time by a Fortune magazine poll of seventeen nobel laureates. He has been a top presidential and government advisor up to the 1970s. Like the discovery of the atomic bomb, scientists around the world made the same discovery around the same time, in this case, 1939. In Russia, Vernadsky and others were stating ideas similar to Rabi's fundamental discovery.
The evidence is growing. There are numerous allegations that electromagnetic and neurological technology is currently being used in programs of nonconsensual human experimentation, in domestic and foreign intelligence projects and for military action. The facts given in this book, such as 1979 UN Russian documentation of nonthermal effects of electromagnetic radiation for weapons use and the US 'nonthermal effects have not been proven' policy coupled with suppression of government funds for nonthermal effects research, are powerful evidence of a 50 year U.S. cold war cover story.
Here is an intriguing quote which a reporter could investigate. Steven Heims wrote"Cybernetics Group" book, Pg. 256, about Gregory Bateson, a famous anthropologist once married to Margaret Mead, (Mead also attended the CIA sponsored, 1950s Joshiah Macy consciousness conferences described above). "I looked up Bateson in Sea Life Park in 1968. I had written to him in connection with my interest in the history of the Macy cybernetics meetings. His response was, " There is certainly a piece of scientific history to be dug out of these meetings-I believe more profound and dramatic than The Double Helix." [The Double Helix refers to DNA]
A global viewpoint
The whole picture of a classified new weapon more powerful than the bomb has never been presented to the public in U.S. mainstream press. The microwave bombardment of the Moscow Embassy began in 1953 and it would seem likely that this was the beginning of the electromagnetic arms race between Russia and the U.S. The fears about development of new weapons of mass destruction has already been reported by all of the recent Soviet leaders in foreign publications and this has been lost in the other major problems of the world. In addition, international diplomatic overtures involving electromagnetic weapons include the 1977-1996 proposals to ban "new weapons of mass destruction using new technologies by the Russians. The public protests via the Moscow Embassy microwave bombardment from 1953 to at least 1988 and the public display of the Russian woodpecker signal which the Russians broadcast in the 1970s, ( see previous CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website articles) were diplomatic war games. From the 1950s to the 1990s, Russians protested U.S. mind control weapons, to no avail.
President Clinton or any president would arguably not have the clout to face the intelligence agencies or the Pentagon over such a deeply entrenched program involving careers and billions of dollars. After fifty years, mind control technology is in the hands of many, mainly the intelligence agencies, the pentagon, defense corporations and scientific research centers. The Jan.11-17, 1993 Defense News article by Barbara Opall stated,
"Known as acoustic psycho-correction, the capability to control minds and alter behavior of civilians and soldiers may soon be shared with U.S. military, medical and political officials, according to U.S. and Russian sources. .Therefore, the Russian authors have proposed a bilateral Center for Psycho-technologies where U.S. and Russian authorities could monitor and restrict the emerging capabilitites."Mind control is here to stay. It is only a matter of when it will be declassified and how? As Dr. Robert Becker, the two time Nobel prize nominee said, it may be too late to stop it.
The classified electromagnetic arms race is over, the U.S. won There are no major enemies of the United States. It is doubtful that the many countries of the world could agree and coordinate efforts against the United States. It would seem that the United States does and will have world control. This weapon would make it possible.
It is safe to predict that the next world war will be bloodless and silent. Nobody will talk about the electromagnetic weapons or how powerful they are because everyone has something to lose. Any victim will tell you, that they would not wish this weapon upon their worst enemy, ( except the perpetrators). So everyone keeps silent. Only the USSR publicly protested with electromagnetic weapons against the United States, since the 1950s up to the 1990s.
Incidents, like the break up of the Soviet Union, even that, did not affect mind control international policy. It is unlikey that a future incident will reveal electromagnetic mind control weapons, based on the Russian diplomatic protests via the Moscow signal and the Russian woodpecker signal etc. In addition, the U.S. would not publicly reveal the purpose of the Moscow signal. In 1970 -90s UN disarmament documents, the Russians asked for the control of the development of weapons using nonthermal effects of electromagnetic radiation. They warned of powerful new electromagnetic weapons of mass destruction while the U.S. maintained an opposite policy from the 1940s to this day , nonthermal health effects have not been proven.
Unfortunately, electromagnetic weapons are not a political hot potato because world opinion does not significantly influence the U.S. The U.S. is in an ideal position for expanding its power. The public does not know about the weapon. If it is used there is no proof tying it to the U.S. and everyone knows not to talk about it or they may be the next victim. One of the many rumors is that Naval Admiral Boorda, who committed suicide, tried to reveal this technology and became a victim of it. (see strategy section above). The U.S. has nothing to lose, nothing to fear. There is everything to gain in keeping this technology classified. There are crimes to cover up. The weapons are powerful intelligence tools which maintain U.S. superiority. Victims can count on the expansion of national security law.
Progress: victim's plans for the future
There are realistic strategies and solutions for dealing with the problem of nonconsensual experimentation using electromagnetic and neurological technologies. Victims must organize: a fundamental step in the process. Victims can work on projects such as codifying, (i.e. making) the Nuremberg Code into U.S. law with punishment for illegal experimentation. National and international laws on new technologies such as electromagnetic weapons need to be passed.
The legal, congressional, executive, human rights groups and media; all are more influenced by money and power than the relatively powerless victims. None of the above listed will take on a losing battle with the U.S. government over a current national security issue. But, victims can work on a grassroots solution. Victims can learn from the government's treatment of Moscow Embassy employees who were bombarded with microwaves, Agent Orange veterans and radiation experimentation victims. The U.S. government has a history of suppressing scientific research that is damaging and abusing the national security act to cover up crime. There has been progress made with newly declassified information and a steady increase in victim's allegations.
There is a high value placed on money and the low comparative value placed on human lives, especially during the cold war and continuing today in the United States, therefore victim's allegations have been ignored. When there is a critical mass of victims, then something will finally officially be done about the 'problem'. But victims should learn from the past and plan a strategy for change. Unfortunately it is a slow process and can hardly be called justice. Of course it is still worth the effort.
International justice: with hard work and strategic planning
It seems clear that an international solution is worth pursuing. It is an avenue around the unethical US national security act. The United States has a poor human rights record and is considered to have a double standard and is losing credibility. But there is no challenge to the US and it's top position in the world. International human rights codes such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights have influenced public opinion. Under a UN world court decision, the atomic bomb was ruled to be an illegal weapon. Even though governments continue to develop it, the UN world court decision is progress towards the goal of global peace.
The United States has opposed efforts to establish an international criminal court. The United States is the superpower and has a major effect on the world. The United States will probably continue with its current, short sighted hegemonic behavior. Criminal charges for war crimes in Rhwanda and Bosnia and against Pinochet under international law is encouraging. Accountability for human rights abuses will diminish future abuses.
A final editorial opinion
The political will during the cold war condoned nonconsensual experimentation as the only feasible means to ensure the national security of the U.S. The rationale was to sacrifice a few victims to save the country from Russian dominance in the race to develop mind control weapons. The political will today has shifted to an economic dominance whereby victims are still sacrificed for progress in space exploration and better technology to ensure a military edge. There is no end in sight for the victims of this Holocaust.
When nonconsensual experimentation first happened to me, I was sure that I had a big court case because it violated the U.S. constitution and every fundamental right I was entitled to as a U.S. citizen. I felt that the democratic system worked and that in time, I would stop the nonconsensual experimentation. But it was not that simple and I was naive. Democracy is a system with flaws and problems. In my opinion, national security law is a cold war legal relic that has seriously harmed the system of democracy. It is up to the public and victims to change their government-imposed fate. The top leaders of this era knowingly condoned, planned and used science and technology for unimaginable evil, after the lesson of Nazi experiments and the Holocaust. The legacy of the development of mind control will be another dark spot in human history.
The weapon has not been used in a major war and the implications of its power has only affected the victims. But some day, the world will know the extent of this issue. World opinion will probably decide that war has been avoided with mind control weapons and therefore many lives were saved, These are some of the complicated issues and harsh realities worth exploring as victims continue to fight for their lives.