The Max Planck Institute broke into the membrane, so to speak, either without knowing about Davydov, Lawrence and Adey, or after learning about them while pursuing a different goal. In either event, a fundamental innovation, a breakthrough discovery or invention will be made several times, at different places, and be persons working independently from one another.It is futile to speculate on who stands where in a race which has barely begun. But it can be postulated that the USSR probably has an ambitious research program, whereas in the US, while work is being done, no program --let alone a crash program--is in existence.
It is predictable that in the wake of Andropov's upgrading of psyops, the relevant programs in the USSR will be given an early and powerful boost.
Future psyops will have to be planned for perspectives which cannot be formulated before the US embarks on a major and totally novel research and development program. Meanwhile, it must be assumed that psyops will grow world wide, in strategic importance and in new forms.
The following report appeared in "Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily" on June 7, 1983:
On May 20, 1983 US newspapers printed an Associated Press story from the Veterans Hospital at Loma Linda, California that the Soviets developed a device, called Lida, to bombard human brains with radio waves. The radio beams and expected to serve as a substitute tranquilizers, and to treat sleeplessness, hypertension, and neurotic disturbances.
It is not yet determined whether Lida affects the immune and endocrine systems. Lida is reported to change behavior in animals. At the present, the device is on loan to Dr. Ross Adey, chief of research at Loma Linda. Adey started testing the machine three months ago, and hopes to complete his investigations within a year.
According to Dr. Adey, who repeatedly visited the USSR, the Soviets have used the machine on people since at least 1960. The machine is technically described as "a distant pulse treatment apparatus". It generates 40 megahertz radio waves which stimulate the brain's electromagnetic activity at substantially lower frequencies.
Dr. Adey was quoted as saying: "Some people theorize that the Soviets may be using an advanced version of the machine clandestinely to seek a change in behavior in the United States through signals beamed from the USSR." No reference was made to the protracted microwaves bombardment several years ago of the US Embassy in Moscow.
On April 29, 1983, Associate Editor Dr. Stefan Possony, addressing the Defense 83 meeting sponsored by Defense & Foreign Affairs, reported on Dr. Adey's work and on the work by Dr. A.S. Davydov of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. Davydov discovered how the blood-brain barrier can be penetrated by low frequency beams and directly affect cells in the brain. Possony's remarks were delivered to a panel studying psychological warfare. [Part of that paper is printed below--Ed.]
In the US research on direct brain waves has scarcely begun, and the USSR has a lead of approximately 25 years. Once it is matured the new technology will be extraordinarily significant in medicine. It also may have major impacts on communications, intelligence, and psychological operations, and permit deliberate physiological impairment.
The KGB is known to be interested in the program. It is not known whether the US and other Governments are trying to determine whether their countries have become targets of clandestine brain waves beamed from the USSR. Nor are there indications that work on countermeasures is being contemplated, except perhaps in the USSR.
"Opening Pandora's Box"
"Opening Pandora's Box", 1984, produced by David Jones for Fulcrum Central Productions, aired on BBC Channel 4. This is a summary of main points of an exceptionally insightful and succinct documentary, not a verbatim account. Many thanks to Harlan Girard for finding a copy of this video.
Project Pandora: The U.S. government explores whether the Soviets are using emr as a weapon
The Soviets started bombarding the American Embassy in Moscow in 1953 and the U.S. government funded Project Pandora to find out why. Project Pandora was "a top secret multimillion dollar program". Top scientific experts were consulted by the American Government "about the meaning of microwaving" of the Moscow Embassy. "Five presidents kept it secret". President Johnson complained to the Soviet Premier Kosygin who claimed that he was unaware of the signal and would be sure that it was turned off. Officially the Soviets did not admit that they were microwaving the Embassy. But the bombardment of the Moscow Embassy continued. It began in 1953 and in 1975 the signals changed. Two new transmitters were added by the Soviets.
Dr. Robert Becker was an eminent scientist and was asked if central nervous system, CNS disturbances occur by microwave radiation. The Pandora Project found that the microwave radiation interferes with decision making capacity, causes chronic stress and low efficiency. The white blood count of Embassy workers was 40% higher than normal. Monkeys exposed to microwave radiation showed a marked decreased performance of simple tasks. Making embassy personnel function less efficiently would obviously be a benefit to the Soviets.
Dr. Becker stated that the U.S. couldn't say anything about it because safety standards for the U.S. were higher than the microwave signals used by the Soviets on the Moscow Embassy. He stated that you do affect cns (central nervous system) by microwave exposure. But if the U.S. admitted bioeffects or athermal effects, meaning not heating effects as from a microwave oven, but other biological effects from the radiation, such as a high white blood count, it would throw into doubt the U.S. standard set "rather arbitrarily " in the 1950s. It would be an embarrassment to the Americans who chose to keep the public in the dark about the microwaving of the Moscow Embassy from 1953 to 1975.
Aluminum screens were put on the Embassy windows so the U.S. government had to discuss the irradiation with the employees. The U.S. public position was that there were "no hazardous levels" of microwaves being irradiated at the Embassy by the Soviets. Questions were raised and complaints made by employees in 1975. At that time, the U.S. State Department consistently lied to Embassy employees and Henry Kissinger replied with a homily about national security and trust and confidence among government employees.
Brief history of U.S./Soviet safety standards set for emr
The safety standards for electromagnetic radiation, emr, were set higher in the 1950s to allow the military to have unlimited use of emr technology. At the time, American science reports suggesting emr health effects of brain tumors, heart conditions, leukemia, cataracts and more, were ignored. The military was a major source of funding and reports were not followed up. The government safety levels for emr were challenged in courts all around the world. Microwave News, a journal on nonionizing radiation, for example, reported that radar men opposed microwave tower emr health dangers. Air traffic controllers and police officers filed complaints. These court cases revolved around the validity of the safety standard. Dr. Milton Zaret, another Pandora scientist explained that most government committees who set the safety standards around the world were set up the in the same way as in the U.S.. Members of the committee did not want to impede or put restraints on progress by tightening the safety standards for emr.
Joe Towne, who repaired radar on spy planes filed a lawsuit against Lockheed for health damages from the radar, for eye damage, cataracts and two heart attacks. Twenty five flyers also sued and won out of court settlements. Towne's case was settled out of court for 75,000$. There was no admission of guilt by Lockheed.
Meanwhile, in October 1982, members of the radar industry met in a Hot Springs, Virginia resort in secret for three days and talked about how to stop the steadily increasing injury claims of service men.
As part of Project Pandora, the U.S. government conducted Operation Big Boy on Navy ships to find any health effects from radar equipment on the ships. Although effects were found, the government terminated the project.
Dr. Becker stated that there was tremendous growth of the communications and power industries and a complete lack of information or even consideration of emr health risks. Industry didn't consider bioeffects of emr until the mid seventies. There was a "complete lack of consideration" of any biological effects from electromagnetic radiation and the repeated dogma was there are "no possible biological effects."
Then there were concerns over complaints and the subsequent study results on computer VDTs and miscarriages and birth defects and powerline exposure and leukemia in adults and children living near them. Studies reported a high incidences of suicide in people living near power lines. Other studies reported that electrical workers were at risk for leukemia. Meanwhile, the U.S. standard had been virtually unchanged since the 1950s.
The Soviet standard was 1000 times lower than the U.S position and their armed forces were exempt from the Soviet standard. The Soviets were aware of biological effects of emr in the 1950s. For example, the top Chech scientist, Dr. Karl Mahra defected to the U.S. in the 1970s. In 1958, he had discovered rats killed by pulsed emr only showed spleen damage when they were autopsied. Dr. Mahra was amazed that other rats recovered fully when exposed for an astonishingly slightly lesser amount of time than the rats who died. Dr. Mahra discovered that the rats did not die of thermal effects of emr but of the athermal emr effects. Dr. Mahra devoted a lifetime of study to the nonthermal biological effects from pulsed emr exposure.
The Controversy over Nonthermal Effects of EMR
Nonthermal effects of emr used as psychological and biological weapons by U.S./Soviets
There is a 1976 Soviet document which stated that microwaves could cause seizures in animals. [See 20+ section for newspaper articles on the document] [A microwave frequency] could be found in human beings, to disorientate a person and a specific frequency could cause a heart attack.
David Jones stated, "Recent intelligence reports say the American army is developing emr weapons programs and predict by year 2000 armies could use them. There will be microwave weapons to disorient and immobilize opposing troops. Psychological attack is particularly effective on air pilots. There is no doubt about the potential of emr [weapons] in the Soviet Union."
Nonthermal emr effects controversy is born. U.S denies effects, Soviets disagree
Dr. Becker commented that the U.S. safety standard presented a dilemma for U.S. military planners. Dr. Becker explained that the problem was that the U.S. population was currently being exposed to the same athermal effects level of emr that the U.S military was using to develop classified emr weapons. This athermal level of radiation is not biologically active, according to the U.S. safety standard. But the dilemma was, how could the U.S. government develop an emr weapon system based on the athermal effects of emr when currently allowing exposure of their own people to the same athermal effects level of emr in their environment from TV and radio towers and microwave ovens, for example? It was a conundrum.
Dr. Becker stated, "A good,...the best cover story is that, based on best American scientist's [opinions],.... the [U.S.] nation has discarded [the theory of athermal] health effects from emr, entirely."
David Jones asked Dr. Koslov; "In terms of science there seems to be two possibilities, one is that behavior and health are affected by emr and the second is the creation of a new genre of weapons and that its conceivable that it is a totally black area of research. Dr. Koslov replied that back in 1965, there was alot of conjecture and hypothesis about that. That's why it led to Project Pandora. Since then, I don't think there is very much possibility, that there is, at this point in time, there doesn't seem to be.
Dr. Sam Koslov, director of Project Pandora continued, [We] thought about it, don't get me wrong,... but nothing was found, it doesn't look like[there is]...militarily at this time, there is no emr weapons potential. There is nothing to the biological effects claim. There is an amount of power problem."
David Jones asked Dr. Koslov why he thought that the Soviets were microwaving the Embassy. Dr. Koslov replied that "I would rather not discuss it [because] it would get into security areas."
[Today, with the nonlethal program unveiled in the 1990s and the Soviet evidence of emr nonthermal effects available today, it is clear that Dr. Koslov was lying in the name of national security. At the least, Dr. Koslov would have been aware of the classified emr nonlethal program which began in the 1960s, see US News, 1997)]
The 1950s, the Lida Machine and Korean Brainwashing
In the 1950s, intelligence agencies were interested in changing mental states. The theory is that brain waves can be tuned to a different emr frequency and can change moods and character. The CIA sponsored LSD experiments and the MKultra Project for 10 million dollars in the early 1960s. A CIA memo stated that they were looking for behavior control to enhance consciousness. The Soviets had realized the same thing. Dr. Ross Adey, famous emr researcher at Loma Linda Veterans Hospital, examined the Lida machine, from the Soviet Union. It was described as a machine to "rearrange consciousness". The Russians claimed to use it for treatment of emotional disorders in the 1950s. Dr. Adey stated that the Lida machine is now obsolete. It used coiled wire inside ear muffs which acted like an antenna and emitted 1/10 sec pulses of emr. Dr. Adey demonstrated that excited animals rapidly quiet down when exposed to the Lida emr frequencies. There was one account that the Lida machine was used during the Korean War for brainwashing American Prisoners.
Since the Korean war, the art of brainwashing has improved significantly, says David Jones
Dr. Becker was asked by the CIA in early 60s to determine whether pilots shot down and captured by Soviets in the 1960s could possibly have been exposed to emr without them realizing it and would that have caused personality change. The pilots were tested psychologically before and when they came home. A dramatic change in test results was found. The question posed was, can you change, entrain brainwaves with an external source? "Pilots did not report bad treatment and were not aware of any emr exposure by Soviets during debriefing sessions." They were interned by the Soviets for two to six week and returned with "considerable personality alterations". The CIA wanted to know if there was a relationship between the Moscow Embassy and flight crews that would cause personality alteration? Dr. Becker stated "yes, there is a distinct possibility, we don't know at this time for sure."
Dr. Robert Beck's (not the same person as Dr. Robert Becker) classified experiments of behavior effects of emr on human subjects for weapons use.
The mechanics of this source of personality change ( Dr. Becker's pilot study above) "fell into an area of science shrouded in the greatest of secrecy". "It is at the center of mind control programs in both the east and west." Dr. Robert Beck, an electronics engineer, is one former member of an elite corp of scientists recruited by his government to work in this area. His published work talks of "specific frequencies that cause anxiety, fear, confusion". His unpublished work include "bizarre experiments in which would disorientate other scientists and is said to include changing moods from elation to depression. He described an experiment in which electromagnetic pulses emitted from a device that looked like a wristwatch caused other diners in a restaurant to talk more loudly or quietly, depending on the em pulse emitted by the wristwatch device."
"What is technically possible?" asks David Jones. "There, I would rather not discuss some of the work that I've seen. It has been done, replicated. Replicated experiments simply done. That subject is totally dark. I've done some of that myself and I'll never do it again. There is no mystery to it. There are ethical considerations. It's part of the physical universe. Changing people's behavior by low levels [of emr], that subject is totally dark."
Dr. Beck continued, "It's possible to replicate experiments, simply, I don't approve of it, a tool to manipulate. But moral considerations are invariably not considered by governments. The Soviets are ahead [in emr research]."
David Jones asked, "As far as affecting human behavior, what is possible? Dr. Beck said, "It's possible, it's been replicated. It's a dark area of research."
The Moscow microwave bombardment is a prototype weapon of the 1977 Soviet Woodpecker Emr signal: Soviet emr weapons go public
Dr. Beck stated, "[the 1976] Russian woodpecker signal is the most powerful man made emr source ever. 10 pulses per second, 40 million watts per pulse, it is psycho active." It is generated in the Soviet Union and permeates everything in the U.S.. It was picked up by power grids and irradiated into homes."
The question is why are the Russians doing this? Dr. Becker said that there are three theories. First, that the Woodpecker signal is an over the horizon radar. No, Dr. Becker stated that a satellite is better available surveillance. Second, the woodpecker signal is for submarine communication. Dr. Becker could not answer that. Third, that the Russian woodpecker is biologically active and will have an effect on populations in U.S. and Canada. In 1976, the Soviets increased the signals and now have seven transmitters. "They are the most expensive and powerful in the world." "Dr. Becker said there are persistent rumors that the U.S. is doing the same to the Soviet Union, powerful U.S. transmitters beaming 16 cycles per second to produce the same effect as the Soviets, into the Soviet Union.' "We are in the middle of electronic warfare aimed at citizens of both countries."
The Woodpecker has been beamed for six to seven years and can't be heard in Soviet Union but can be heard in Britain, Western Europe, Australia and Far East. Dr. Beck, [the electronic engineer] stated that the magnetic component can penetrate anything. "We have decoded intelligence on the signal. The 10 Hz signal is a benign frequency and we know it can be psycho active. 30% of the population will exhibit neuronal manifestations. Soviet scientists know about psychoactive effects in animals. Soviet scientists knew well before 1950s. The Soviets published research on long term effects of microwaves, extreme fatigue, loss of coordination and sensory control. A group in American Intelligence believed that one can alter brainwaves of staff of Moscow Employees and the Moscow signal was a prototype of the Russian Woodpecker."
Dr. Beck continued, "If you drop frequency down a few hertz, it is known to be neuronally psychoactive and you could have basket cases. [This is] more terrifying and frightening than the atomic bomb. It's a brand new concept, we haven't adapted to this concept. Having done a number of experiments, one can't imagine the destructive power of these things. There were no National Institute of Health, NIH guidelines in the experiments I conducted. I know what some of these things can do to the nervous system. Most wars are fought over real estate. [It will be] better to use psyop weapons than atomic bombs- alot cleaner, more terrain left, it could just kill people. There is no defense that I know of."
Twenty years later: Passage of time reveals cold war secrets
Nonthermal effects of emr were used as a basis for weapons and is a national security issue
The main point of this documentary for victims is that the controversy over athermal effects of emr is described as a national security issue by top emr scientists such as Dr. Becker, Dr. Beck and Dr. Zaret, all of whom were consulted by the CIA about the irradiation of the Moscow Embassy. While the emr related industries and the military wanted to avoid lawsuits and have unlimited development of emr technology, that does not fully explain why the U.S. used the athermal controversy as a national security cover story for fifty years.
U.S. cover story of no provable athermal effects can no longer be credibly maintained by U.S.
In the 1990s, the nonlethal emr weapons program based in part on athermal effects of emr was unveiled by the Pentagon, (US News, 1997). The U.S. cover story can no longer be credibly maintained. With the U.N. documents, the 20+ Russian articles and the Lopatin book, Dr. Becker's theory of a classified U.S. emr mind control weapons program is now well supported. The 1979 UN Russian documents state that athermal effects are used for developing weapons. The 20+ articles discuss emr mind control weapons after the break up of the Soviet Union and Lopatin is a very high Russian government official who has advocated banning mind control weapons in Russia for the last ten years.
According to Dr. Becker, consultant to the CIA in the early 1960s, the Soviets irradiated the Moscow Embassy and U.S citizens with the Woodpecker signal at great cost and for decades. See 1988 AP article which states that microwave bombardment of Moscow Embassy and the Russian Woodpecker signals were being irradiated as of 1988. In "Opening Pandora's Box", Dr. Becker discussed the U.S. public silence about the Soviet irradiations and the rumored U.S. efforts at irradiation of the Soviet Union. Dr. Becker described these aggressive acts by the Soviets and the U.S. as an electronic war on the citizens of both countries.
In addition, the Harlan Girard articles from Russia and China on emr nonlethal weapons is further support of the fact that athermal effects of emr are the basis for nonlethal weapons. Now there is enough evidence to refute the U.S. position that there are 'no provable nonthermal biological effects from emr.
U.S. government knew of athermal emr effects at least in the 1960s
Now it can be proven; the U.S. knew of the biological athermal effects of emr at least in the 1960s, when the secret Pandora Project began (see Brodeur, Zapping of America, 1977). For further evidence of the U.S. knowledge of athermal effects, see also the thorough and well documented history of this period, written in "Electromagnetic Man" by Cyril Smith, 1989 and "Body Electric" by Dr. Becker and Gary Selden, 1985.
The U.S. made the decision to risk the health of U.S. citizens rather than to deal with the situation in another way. The U.S. did not lower the emr safety level even though they knew athermal health effects were confirmed at this time. Rather, the U.S. government perpetuated the dogma. In the mid 70s, Kisssinger and the State Department held that there were no health risks from emr exposure at the Moscow Embassy. Apparently, to the U.S. government, the national security issue was more important than the health of its citizens.
U.S. government is on the record for lying about scientific facts in the name of national security and risking the health of U.S. citizens
By basing the U.S. safety standard for emr exposure on politics rather than scientific evidence, the U.S. government knowingly risked the health of U.S. citizens. The U.S. government is on the record for lying about scientific facts in the name of national security.
Evidence supports a 'Manhattan Project' mind control program based on emr athermal effects
Scientific evidence
A serious problem for validating the claims of victims of government mind control experiments is that even today the general public does not know of the little publicized athermal emr effects controversy or mind control weapons. The good news is that it does not take a rocket scientist to put the facts together because after fifty years, the motives and actions of the military becomes clear. Dr. Becker was right. Echoing Dr. Becker twenty years later, Dr. Louis Slesin, Microwave News editor was quoted in U.S. News, 7-7-97 article entitled "Wonder Weapons'. "...the human body is essentially an electrochemical system, and devices that disrupt the elctrical impulses of the nervous system can affect behavior and body funcitons. But these programs- particluarly these involving antipersonnel research- are so well guarded that details are scarce. "People [in the military] go silent on this issue ...more than any other issue. People just do not want to talk about this." Based on Dr. Becker and Dr. Slesin's comments, there was and is a classified nonlethal weapons program that targets the brain with emr. The U.S. News article clearly states that athermal effects of emr are the basis of the nonlethal weapons. "...scientists, aided by government research on the "bioeffects" of beamed energy, are searching teh electromagnetic and sonic spectrums for wavelengths that can affect human behavior."
The argument can now move to the extent that athermal biological emr weapon effects are capable of controlling the human body and behavior.
The extent of the mind control arsenals may be less difficult to prove than the athermal controversy because there is no need to wait fifty years for unclassified historical evidence. The U.S. or Russian government will never admit to classified mind control weapons, therefore one way of answering this is through open literature theories on neurology. The athermal effects of emr the biological basis for brain function is described in current neurology research. Refer to CAHRA [now Mind Justice] website, "As Powerful as the Atomic Bomb for citations, mindjustice.org [updated 2-04].
Thanks to mind control researcher Margo Cherney, here is one stunning example of many available examples to support the theory that mind control weapons are extremely advanced. Note the cover story that the Soviets have mind control research, that brain research for weapons purposes is classified and that emr athermal effects are the basis of the brain weapons. The stunning information is that the government is funding research to produce a device that can "inject information into the brain via electromagnetic waves".
U.S. News, 1-3-2000. John Norseen. Reading-and changing-your mind. Rodolfo Llina's. A grand unification theory of the brain.
[Lockheed Martin neuroengineer in Intelligent Systems Division] Norseen's interest in the brain stems from a Soviet book he read in the mid-1980s, claiming that research on the mind would revolutionize the military and society at large. [He] coined the term "Biofusion" to cover his plans to map and manipulate [the brain] leading to advances in ...national security... and ...would be able to convert thoughts into computer commands by deciphering the brain's electrical activity. BioFusion would reveal the fingerprints of the brain by using mathematical models, [Smirnov's computer program uses mathematical models also]. It sound crazy,...The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, ...have all awarded...research contracts to Norseen. Norseen is waiting to hear if the second stage of these contracts-portions of them classified- comes through. Norseen's theories are grounded in current science. ...By MRI, scientists can tell what the person was doing at the time of the recording...Emotions from love to hate can be recognized from the brain's electrical activity. ...Norseen predicts profiling by brain print will be in place by 2005. ...Norseen would like to draw upon Russian brain-mimicking software and American brain -mapping breakthroughs to allow that communication to take place in a less invasive way. A modified helmut could record a pilot's brainwaves. "When you say right 090 degrees...the computer would see that electrical pattern in the brain and turn the plane 090 degrees. If the pilot misheard instructions to turn 090 degrees and was thinking "080 degrees," the helmut would detect the error, then inject the right number via electromagnetic waves."
U.S. News, 1-3-2000. Rodolfo Llina's. A grand unification theory of the brain.
Dr. Rodolfo Llinas, New York University of Medicine, "believes consciousness has to do with timing, and the thalamus-rather than being a mere relay station-also functions as the brain's clock. Using an instrument called a magnetoencephalograph, or MEG-a technology Llinas helped develop-he has been studying the brain's electromagnetic waves. What he has found in broad paraphrase is that the thalamus is in constant dialogue with the brain's higher processing centers: An electromagnetic loop sends pulses from the thalamus to the cortex, but the different sensory centers of the brain also message the thalamus in return. Consciousness exists when these oscillations are in sync-pulsing at the same rate--so smells, sounds, and so forth assemble in a kind of electromagnetic symphony. ...If the theory holds up to future testing, it would point toward the possibility ...implants-neurological pacemakers-to correct the out-of-wack timing of the thalamic messaging system. Preliminary clinical work has already demonstrated the therapeutic value of thalamic stimulation in treating Parkinson's disease and depression.
Historical evidence
According to Dr. Becker, great efforts were expended by the U.S. to cover up the emr nonthermal effects while the Soviets expended huge sums of money and time targeting the Moscow Embassy with microwaves. The Russians also targeted the United States with the Russian Woodpecker signal. Dr. Becker stated that there were persistent rumors of U.S. beaming a signal over the USSR.
The Russians publicly denied the microwave bombardment and the official, transparent reason for the Russian Woodpecker signal was an over-the-horizon radar. An electronic battle of emr signals which targeted the citizens of both countries was raging without their knowledge while the U.S. remained silent and the Russians publicly asserted athermal effects of emr in UN documents and scientific literature in order to embarrass the U.S. government. Fifty years later, the Russians finally succeeded in their attempts to ruin the credibility of the Americans over the athermal controversy. But most U.S. and Russian citizens are unaware of this fact because the military and the cell phone industry still use the standard to avoid lawsuits and use emr based technology that could be limited if a more stringent standard were in place. Therefore the athermal argument is rarely publicized.
In 1984, Dr. Koslov, director of Project Pandora stated that there were no military weapons programs based on the athermal effects of emr. Then in the early 1990s, The U.S. unveiled the nonlethal emr weapons program. Dr. Koslov had to be lying, since U.S. News, 1997 reported that the nonlethal weapons programs had begun over 40 years ago. Since the break up of the Soviet Union, Russian public figures such as Lopatin, scientists such as Tsygankov and military experts are publicly discussing mind control weapons as a very serious threat. Now, in Russian and U.S. newspaper accounts, the symptoms of independent reports from U.S and Russian alleged victims of illegal experiments are being compared and match up. Hundreds of victims worldwide describe an illegal global experimentation program using an array of highly developed and powerful mind control technology.
The U.S. government is on the record for lying about this issue. The cell phone industry is on the record for upholding the athermal effects theory. The motives of money and national security are clear. Fifty years later, the truth is out. Given the body of evidence in this compilation, it is logical to conclude that there is a mind control program more secret than the Manhattan Project, as Dr. Becker theorized and that brain function is based on an athermal emr biological effects. Given the motive of national security, it is hard not to believe that very sophisticated technology has been developed to control the mind, comparable to the atomic bomb.
An Electronic War starting with the Moscow Embassy: Serious Implications for the World
Dr. Becker described the microwave bombardment of the U.S Moscow embassy for over 20 years and the Russian Woodpecker Signal for over 10 years as an electronic war on the citizens of both Russia and the U.S. See 1988 AP article which states that microwave bombardment of Moscow Embassy and the Russian Woodpecker signals were being irradiated as of 1988. Given Dr. Becker's discussion of U.S. pilots and their behavioral changes after being shot down by the Russians, there is no doubt many more electronic battles that are entirely out of the public view. Dr. Michael Persinger was featured on the 1998 Learning Channel, War 2020 program describing emr mind control possibilities. The announcer stated that the next war may be won without so much as a shot being fired or even a whimper. By putting the evidence together, a picture emerges of governments who ignore human rights, cover up criminal acts and conduct battles out of the public eye. Dr. Becker stated in his 1991 book, "Crosscurrents", that it may be too late. Besides the need to stop illegal government emr weapons experiments, it is important to educate the public because of the far-reaching global effects surrounding this issue.
HAARP, the U.S. transmitter of the 1990s, EU experts fear a vast weapons system capable of modifying the weather, influencing human behavior and more.
The article, "Apocalypse Now? HAARP or How the US Military is Playing the Sorcerer's Apprentices", by Alain Gossens, Bussels Telemoustique, 22-5-97 was translated by FBIS from french,(see foia section for whole article). The article describes the controversy surrounding the HAARP project. "Unofficially, HAARP will use the ionosphere, turning it into an energy weapon." Similar to the Moscow Embassy microwave bombardment and the Russian Woodpecker, the public is never told what is really going on. It is difficult to not believe that these are powerful weapons because both countries continue for decades to develop them. According to Dr. Becker and now other experts such as Dr. Bertell, (see foia section, last article) and the numerous articles on HAARP, there is a scientific basis for mind control.
Here is an article to show how the health standards for emr controversy continues.
March/April 2001
Views on the News: Weapons Development and Public Health Should Not MixThe Pentagon's new microwave weapon has been brought to you by the U.S. Air Force and Raytheon. These are the same organizations that control the IEEE's SCC-28 committee that writes the standard for exposures to RF and microwaves.
Dr. John Osepchuk, the chair of SCC-28, worked for Raytheon for most of his professional career. And three of the other five members of the SCC-28 executive committee work either at Brooks Air Force Base or for Raytheon.
In the 1980s, during the last major revision of the IEEE standard, Osepchuk was among those who argued for doubling the limit, from 5 to 10 mW/cm2, for frequencies above 3 GHz (see MWN,J/A86). The rationale -which we never understood- was to make it consistent with the infrared standard all the way up at 300 GHz. This change, though challenged, was adopted.
At the time it appeared to be somewhat of an academic concern, given the paucity of radiation sources above 30 GHz. But few were privy to the designs of military contractors. The loosening of the IEEE standard must have facilitated the development of the military's new zapper at 95 GHz.
It seems obvious, but it's worth repeating: Health standards should be written by medical and public health professionals, not those who make weapons for the military-industrial complex.
2000 Video by Council on Wireless Technology Impacts, "Public Exposure" More evidence of the athermal emr health effects controversy
Thanks goes to Betsy Manning a behind -the-scenes mind control researcher who is always coming up with new leads. Betsy found this excellent 2000 video, "Public Exposure, DNA, Democracy and the Wireless Revolution" by the Council on Wireless Technology Impacts, (website at www.ccwti.org. A website link provided ordering information on the book "The Electric Wilderness" by biophysicist Andrew Marino and Joel Ray, forward by Dr. Robert Becker, San Francisco Press, 1986. The book details the 25 year battle over emf effects and the politics of science in the four year New York State hearing on a 765 TV power line, 1974-1978.)
This video exposes emr industry abuses similar to the tobacco industry. For example, the cell phone industry has billions of dollars at stake and this is the explanation for the industry's complete lack of concern for the health of consumers. Marin's rate of breast cancer is the highest in the world, (Northern California Cancer Center, 1995) and this motivated the Marin Breast Cancer Watch to sponsor an epidemiolodgy study to see if there is an association between and reported cancer cases and cell phone towers, military radar and other sources of emr. There is a study by another group to determine if there is a connection between emr exposure and the 300% increase in brain tumors worldwide.
Explosion of EMR sources in last hundred years
The video began with the fact that in the last one hundred years, exposure to emr has increased 10,000 times. "Human cells of the body are like antennas; they receive and emit emr and are extremely sensitive " The video continued with a short history on the explosion of emr development, beginning with WWII. Military personnel such as radar workers experienced abnormalities in blood count, mutation, headaches and cataracts. This data was ignored by the U.S. government mainly because there was a war.
Dr. John Goldsmith, an epidemiologist from Israel described the Soviet microwave bombardment of the Moscow Embassy from 1953 to 1976. He said the that the Soviets could have been trying to produce radio frequency sickness in the U.S. embassy staff by causing interference with the "ability to think, to concentrate and to sleep". The Soviets conducted scientific studies of workers who were exposed to emr emissions in the 1940s and 1950s and found detrimental health effects such as the above. The Soviets called the set of symptoms 'Radiofrequency sickness syndrome'. Dr. Goldsmith believed that the Soviets were experimenting and testing radio frequency radiation as a weapon. The U.S. government's epidemiologist documented high white blood counts, leukemia in two of the Ambassadors and other health problems in the embassy employees. Then the U.S. government ignored the findings.
The wireless revolution now continues with the fast growing cell phone market worldwide. The Council on Wireless Technology Impacts asked the question, what are the environmental effects of the wireless revolution?
How the U.S. safety limit for emr exposure puts the U.S public health at risk.
The next segment was filmed at an April 2000 California Senate hearing sponsored by Senator Tom Hayden on cell phone safety. The U.S. safety limit does not take into account athermal health effects of emr which are occurring below the U.S. safety level. The cell phone industry completely disregards scientific studies of cell phone emission levels falling below the government safety standard. Cell phones are placed on the market as a safe product when in reality there may be health risks from their use.
Cindy Sage, a California environmental policy consultant explained that reliable studies show detrimental health effects from exposure to radio frequencies way below the safety standard set by the U.S. government. The cell phone industry spokesman testified at the California Senate hearing that the cell phone industry was in compliance with FCC and other government standards and there were no health risks associated with cell phone use. But using a chart, Cindy Sage explained that the cell phone industry claim did not include research of cell phone emissions in the nonthermal range, which is below the safety level established by the FCC. This is the cause of the controversy.
Dr. Jerry Phillips, Research Biochemist, Colorado testified that Motorola was suppressing research. Dr. Phillip's research for Motorola found DNA damage associated with cell phone emission levels. He also stated that the brain was exquisitely sensitive to RFR or radio frequency radiation. Motorola was not happy with the results and told Dr. Phillips how to write abstracts, conduct his work and finally urged him not to publish. Dr. Phillips published the study in 1998.
Now Dr. Phillips recommends caution because no money is available for research except from the cell phone industry. He has no faith in their results. The cell phone industry earned $20 billion in 1996 and $475 billion in 2000. Senator Hayden commented that the "buying of science" was what caused him the greatest concern. He had a strong opinion for the "corrupting influence of money on science". Hayden stated that the FDA have not been able to scientifically certify cell phone technology as safe or not safe and therefore, he urges caution.
Analogy to tobacco industry and health risks of smoking
California Senator Tom Hayden stated that an association between the exposure to emr from cell phones and the risk of detrimental health effects is established. A direct cause and effect, as in scientific proof has not been established but like the 'cigarettes do not cause cancer' scientific controversy, there is enough proof to warrant a warning to the public.
Cindy Sage described three levels of proof, the scientific level of proof, which is the highest level, almost 100%, the legal standard of proof, or 51%, the more probable than not standard and the environmental law standard, in the 10 to 30% range. Ms. Sage stated that the environmental law standard is the level at which public decision making on environmental issues takes place, i.e., at the potential level for a significant impact. Ms. Sage believes that the emr controversy should be judged by the environmental law standard of proof and she mentioned the California Environmental Quality Act. [Note, I took an environmental law class in summer 2001 and the 2001 environmental law text book listed emr under toxic substances and described it as a controversial topic.]
Business tactics include conscious disregard for health risks of consumer products.
Science author B. Blake Levitt wrote "Electromagnetic Fields", 1995 and stated that the cell phone industry "cynically knows" it will take twenty years for scientific evidence to prove damaging health effects from cell phone emr exposure. Brain tumors are beginning to show up in cell phone users. It will probably take ten to fifteen years for brain cancer to show up in people who live near cell towers. It will take two years to gather data, three years for peer review and four years to end up in journals. In the meantime, billions of dollars are pocketed by the cell phone industry. This is similar to the business tactics of the tobacco companies in which many smokers died of lung cancer, while the companies suppressed clear scientific evidence of an association of health risks to smoking and also the addictive qualities of nicotine in cigarettes. The emr controversy is following the same pattern. Two brain tumor victims whose emr exposures occurred in the cell phone industry were interviewed.
Telecommunications Act bars consideration of health factors in local government decisions on cell tower location.
Another highlight in this video were the protest marches around the country against section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Linda Evans, TV star of "Dallas" explained. Section 704 states that local governments are banned from taking into consideration the health effects of microwave, TV, radio and other emr towers that are to be located in their area.
"People just didn't know, like myself, I was ignorant and we have lost our rights." The laws need to be changed.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the U.S. safety standard is too high to protect the U.S. public. The standard is outdated and needs to include the well-established athermal health effects. It is critical that impartial research into nonthermal health effects is funded adequately. Public safety is at stake and politics and money do not belong in science.
The cigarette industry used the scientific standard of proof, saying there is no link between smoking and lung cancer. The cell phone industry is using the same tactic. Environmental issues are decided at the 10-30% level of potential harm in order to protect public health. The cigarette industry's scientific standard of proof did not protect the public. Today, it is a proven fact that many smokers died from lung cancer as a result of smoking and the addictive qualities of nicotine. Therefore the environmental standard of proof should be used in the emr research evaluations in order to protect the public.