1.
Where does the Russian translation Project fit in to the evidence?
A. A Few Conclusions
B. Short overview: The scientific basis for emr mind control weapons, athermal effects of emr. Plenty of evidence in mainstream press
1. Davis Enterprise, 3-1-2001 "Frankengenes': The Dark Side of Biotechnology" by Lee Bowman
2. Parade Magazine, Dec. 29, 1996, Reuters: "Best News for Mortals" "British scientists say they're working on a "Soul-Catcher" memory chip, which would record human memories and thoughts, and expect it to be workng within 30 years." Open literature discusses scientists interested in futuristic technology.
3. New York Times Magazine, Sept 29, 1996, "The Altered State" by Elizabeth Rotte. "Michael Persinger, a psychologist and neuroscientist at Laurentian University in Ontario, ...solenoids, which create gently fluctuating fields ...The impulses move through ...the brain, where they interfere and interact with the complex electrical patterns of the subject's neural fields. Persinger aims...switches ...they sense a sexual arousal.. negative presence, a benevolent force , opiate effects,..."
4. Bulletin of Atomic Scientist, Sept/Oct 1994 by Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, "The Soft Kill Fallacy". "Many of the non-lethal weapons under consideration utilize infrasound or electromagnetic energy...These weapons are said to cause ...interference with mental processes, modification of behavior and emotional response,...severe pain... The current surge of interest in electromagnetic and similar technologies makes the adoption of a protocol explicitly outlawing the use of these dehumanizing weapons an urgent mater."
5. US. News Jan 3/10 2000 by Douglas Pasternak, "John Norseen, Reading your mind and injecting smart thoughts" "BioFusion would be able to convert thoughts into computer commands, predicts Norseen, by deciphering the brain's electrical activity. ... Norseen's theories are grounded in current science. Mapping human brain functions is now routine..."
C. American victim's accounts match Russian accounts
1. U S District Court Eastern District of CA No Misc. 94-097-WBS John M. Ginter, Plaintiff, v. California Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. John Ginter, San Quentin prisoner with high school education described in his 1967 court case that Dr. Schmidt, the San Quentin psychiatrist called the equipment used on John, "M.I.N.D. or Magnetic Integrated Neuron Duplicator".
2. Los Angeles Times, 3-28-88 part 2 page 1, "A Fearful Fix Grips Figure in Kickbacks" by Kim Murphy, Rex Niles, an FBI informant in a defense contractors kick back case in Los Angeles, CA. Photo caption stated, "His aluminum foil hat has tiny holes in it, says Rex Niles, proof that the government is bombarding him with microwaves in an attempt to kill him." He had detected microwave signals but was still labeled mentally ill."
3. New York Times Magazine, Aug. 31, 1997, "Atomic Guinea Pigs" by Michael D'Antonio "At the Department of Energy, which oversees America's nuclear-weapons research, these people [radiation experiment victims] were referred to collectively as "the Crazies." But the opening of the cold-war archives has brought the Crazies in from the fringe." The mind control victims in Russia and the U.S. are both labeled mentally ill.
A Few Conclusions
Victims have two strong arguments for demanding an investigation into their allegations. If the Russians have mind control weapons, the U.S. undoubtedly has a mind control arsenal.
The evidence in this compilation spans 50 years, includes several independent, mainstream sources, and credible professionals, all stating that mind control in Russia exists. The historical and scientific evidence also supports a very long-term, large and classified emr weapons program in Russia and the U.S. The U.S government is on record for lying to the U.S. public about lack of proof of nonthermal effects while the Russians claim that nonthermal effects of emr are being used for weapons. Now in the 1990s, the U.S. reveals the nonlethal weapons program and claims in U.S. News and World Report, 7-7-97, that "scientists, aided by the military research on the 'bioeffects' of beamed energy are searching the electromagnetic and sonic spectrums for wavelengths that can affect human behavior." The translation of the 1999 Lopatin book is the best evidence yet, a top Russian politician and scientist claim Russian mind control weapons exist and should be under international control.
Second, the athermal controversy is equally convincing historical evidence of a classified U.S. mind control program.
The number of victims in the U.S. and Russia, not to mention other countries is growing. For the first time, victims as a group can now organize and go to their congressional representatives, human rights groups, lawyers and investigative reporters and present an adequate level of proof of their claims, never before possible. The evidence now meets the standard of proof required for mainstream journalism, public knowledge and investigations such as a GAO investigation or a congressional hearing or a human rights investigation. Please see below for evidence and citations.
Electronic warfare since 1953, without public knowledge
In "Project Pandora", Dr. Becker, an emminent scientist consulted by the U.S. government on emr national security issues has warned of the electronic war on the citizens of the U.S and U.S.S.R. Many experts including Oppenheimer have warned that the Orwellian dangers of mind control are worse than the atomic bomb,(American Psychological Association). Information warfare using the mind as a target was described in the tv program, War 2020. War would be fought without even knowledge of a war taking place, (See CAHRA [now Mind Justice] International Campaign section).
In his 1990s book, "Crosscurrents", Dr. Becker wrote that it may be too late to stop the ongoing weapons programs. Unlike peace, electronic warfare resembles another cold war with its resultant high costs. Experts and public officials from the east and west warn of the dangers of psychotronic weapons or nonlethal emr weapons, the need for international control and of the need for open public debate.
What can be done?
CAHRA [now Mind Justice] does not have the resources to organize victims but I hope that others will. If this issue is presented as the international human rights issue that it is, public officials will be able to use their authority to ask for an investigation. CAHRA [now Mind Justice] will send this compilation with original articles and translation at cost for xeroxing and postage to anyone interested in stopping nonconsensual government experiments.
Finally, thank you to all of the victims who generously donated to this project and also to those who shared their information included in this article. I could not have done it without you. The Russian translation project is a major step forward. I hope that much more research can be done and that as a result, a better strategy to stop illegal government experiments will be found in our lifetime.
Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse, CAHRA [now Mind Justice]
a nonprofit 501(c)3 human rights group
Cheryl Welsh, Director,
915 Zaragoza St.
Davis, CA 95616 USA
click to e-mail 
mindjustice.org [updated 2-04]